Monday, July 30, 2007

Stosh Battles Media Bias

The Detroit Free Press Sunday front page screams the news that Michigan has a higher percentage of millionaires than America. Woo-hoo, we are in the pink after all.

I snatch the paper from Maggie. I gotta see this. Surely there will be charts and graphs that I crave with my coffee.

Nope. No charts, no graphs, not even a fun-fact except that 3% of USA households have assets over $1 million but 4% of Michigan households do. Much ink over nuthin.'

But I read on. And on. Through the huge inside continued. It turns out, the article is actually about Anyone Can be a Millionaire, Through Hard Work. This is not on Border's out-sized Self Help Shelf, but the front page lead of Michigan's big paper. One guy in Bloomfield Hills made it by the time he was 26, working "90 hours a week." The careful reader notes that his name sounds familiar; turns out that his pop owns a huge car dealership out in the burbs somewhere.

Hmm. A millionaire begets a millionaire. Maybe that could be news. So I move my coffee to the computer and pen a helpful suggestion.

Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 10:13 AMTo: Tompor, SusanSubject: Millionaires

Ms. Tompor,

I read your millionaire piece with interest. Interesting that 3% of USA households have $1 mil or better in assets, but 4% in Michigan.

I have a critique to offer, which leads to a suggestion for another piece.

In a long article, you have only one clause with a clue on the #1 reason for the growth in the number of millionaires ("wealthy families passing along their money to children and grandchildren...")

I would suggest that most of those millionaires got there by that method, and fewer by the means you indicate in the article: hard work.

They inherit money from parents and grandparents; working folks often instead financially take care of parents or grandparents. Big difference.

Long before inheritance time, they also have trusts and gifts to put their kids thru college; free down payments on a house as a nice wedding gift to avoid any debt; same for cars, private schools for the kids, smooth sailing thru college and law school, money passed along if they get into some difficultly or have an illness, you name it. Working folks dont often have those benefits.

And this doesnt even get to the connections that wealth brings, connections that bring more wealth.

As you indicate, 500 GM management people have $1 mil or better in just their 401(k), while 5 hourly workers do. Interesting ratio. How many of those management folks got up that high simply by "hard work" and how many came from well-to-do families?

Punchline: I think it would be interesting to do a piece on this factor of wealth-thru-inheritance. With stats on what percentage of millionaires got the bulk of their wealth by such transfers. Interesting, and informative, on such issues as the inheritance tax debate. If most rich people worked hard 90 hrs a week collecting pop bottles to get there, then the inheritance tax may seem unfair. If most are just lucky-by-birth, even if wonderful folks -- though there are plenty like Paris Hilton -- then the inheritance tax looks a lot different.

I hope this is of interest.

Stosh Pulaski
Detroit

And I got this response:

Thanks for your note. I appreciate your comments.
Susan

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

duh--man bites dog, dog bites man. Why write an article drawing attention to the ugly and better-ignored realities of social class? Nevertheless, I appreciate your comments.

Unknown said...

"Hard work". Down here in Georgia the meme for the wealthy is "achievers". Or do you get Neal Boortz up there, too?